Hi all,
My rank I´m afraid is only vet sergeant, cause I didn´t have the time to play many games during the campaign and refused to enter fictional battle results. What I would just like to say is that I find it a shame that rank is based on the amount of battles played rather than the amount played and your win ratio. In otherwords, if I commanded an army to the field 50 times and lost 48 battles I should not be promoted to a higher rank, rathewr demoted or as in real life be stripped of my command and rank. A colonel should have skill and experience.
Anyways, good going people, some of you have amazing ratios, really impressive and worthy of BA officers. I hope next campaign I´ll be able to achieve similar results. As is I only won 75% of the battles I played for the campaign, 3 out of the 4. Not many but at least all real and honest, unlike some players that entered fake results according to one of the EOT newsletters. (which is really why I think the FoO lost)
"Strike First, Strike Hard, NO MERCY!"